Educational Technology and Student Privacy Law
Educational technology transforms teaching and learning while creating complex privacy, accessibility, and data security obligations. This guide examines FERPA, COPPA, state student privacy laws, and vendor contract requirements that govern edtech platforms, learning management systems, and classroom technology used by schools to deliver digital learning and manage student information.
Educational technology encompasses the software, platforms, and digital tools used to deliver instruction, assess learning, manage classrooms, and support student services. Learning technology includes learning management systems, student information systems, adaptive learning software, assessment platforms, communication tools, and educational apps that collect, store, and process vast amounts of student data. Federal law, particularly FERPA and COPPA, establishes baseline privacy protections, while state laws increasingly impose stricter requirements on data collection, use, disclosure, and retention. Education software vendors must navigate complex compliance obligations including data security standards, breach notification requirements, parental consent for young children, and restrictions on advertising and data mining. Schools remain responsible for protecting student privacy even when delegating functions to third-party providers, requiring careful vendor selection, contract negotiation, and ongoing monitoring of edtech compliance.
FERPA governs educational records privacy at schools receiving federal funding, restricting disclosure without parent consent and providing access and amendment rights. Classroom technology and digital learning platforms that collect student information from school-directed activities generally qualify as school officials under FERPA when contracts limit use to educational purposes, prohibit unauthorized re-disclosure, require data security, and allow school oversight. COPPA applies to online services directed to children under 13 or with actual knowledge of child users, requiring verifiable parental consent before collecting personal information. Schools can consent on behalf of parents for educational purposes, but edtech vendors must implement COPPA-compliant practices including clear privacy policies, parental rights to review and delete data, and restrictions on behavioral advertising to children. State student privacy laws such as California's SOPIPA and New York's Education Law 2-d add requirements around data minimization, purpose limitations, security standards, and prohibition of targeted advertising or data sales, with variations across states creating compliance challenges for edtech companies operating nationally.
Data security and breach response obligations for educational resources have intensified as cyber threats target schools and edtech vendors. Schools must implement administrative, technical, and physical safeguards protecting student records including encryption, access controls, employee training, and incident response plans. Edtech vendors face contractual obligations to maintain security standards, undergo security audits, and notify schools promptly of breaches. State breach notification laws require schools and vendors to notify affected individuals when personally identifiable information is compromised, with variations in timing, content, and triggers. Ransomware attacks, phishing incidents, and misconfigured databases have exposed student data including grades, disciplinary records, health information, and biometric data, resulting in regulatory investigations, class action litigation, and reputational harm. Legal counsel must help schools and vendors implement proactive security measures, develop breach response protocols, and navigate post-breach obligations including forensics, notification, credit monitoring, and regulatory cooperation.
Accessibility and equity in educational technology require compliance with Section 504, ADA, and increasingly state accessibility laws mandating that digital learning tools work with assistive technologies. Online learning platforms, education software, and electronic educational resources must be perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust for students with disabilities through features like screen reader compatibility, keyboard navigation, captions, and alternative formats. Procurement processes should include accessibility evaluation, vendor attestations of WCAG compliance, and remediation commitments when deficiencies exist. Digital divides in technology access, internet connectivity, and digital literacy create equity concerns when schools rely heavily on classroom technology without ensuring all students have necessary devices and connectivity. Legal issues also arise around algorithmic bias in adaptive learning software, student surveillance technologies, and data analytics that may perpetuate or amplify disparities. Educational technology law requires balancing innovation and efficiency benefits with fundamental obligations to protect student privacy, ensure accessibility, maintain security, and promote equity. Attorneys advising schools and edtech companies must understand technical capabilities and limitations, risk assessment, contract negotiation, regulatory compliance, and the educational context in which learning technology operates to support student success while safeguarding rights.